Code of Conduct

The School has published a new ‘Code of Conduct’ following extensive consultation with its senior students. Last autumn, groups across the UK discussed a draft and tutors provided feedback from more than 30 groups in London and the branches.

All the suggestions were considered, numerous amendments proposed and a final version developed in close consultation with the School leader and Principal.

Nigel Pate, who led the development work, said the move away from the previous Rules found overwhelming support.

“Refinements, such as students being encouraged to speak about the School to family and friends while respecting confidentiality of what is said in the group, were warmly welcomed. So too was the distinction between unnecessary, negative criticism and constructive discussion and questioning.”

There was also broad support for greater transparency, including publishing the Code on the website and introducing it to new students.

Encouragingly, tutors reported on some challenging subjects having been aired in the groups.  “The fact that some women students, for example, were able to speak up in their group about feeling ‘marginalised’ or ‘invisible’ is important. If students find certain aspects of the Code remain aspirational, that’s fine. It reminds us we have further to go.”

Some suggested greater clarity about grievance and complaints procedures and what happens when the Code is breached. Having considered this further, it was decided to opt for simplicity with the guidance that students raise their concerns respectfully with their tutor “or other appropriate person”.

The most contentious areas, said Nigel Pate, were around the School’s role when it came to personal relationships and financial or business dealings with fellow students.

“There were cases where students had felt protected by following the old rules, but opinions were divided as to how relevant these rules are today. Many felt it was not the School’s place to intervene in personal relationships. Or they questioned whether a tutor should be asked for advice on financial matters.”

This feedback led to a new section, headed “Respecting relationships”. Including the wording “our tutors are also students”, it stresses the importance of the teacher-student relationship being “underpinned by integrity and mutual respect”. It also states simply that it is “important not to use our participation in the School for our own personal advantage.”

The Code was initially developed by the Strategy Working Group in 2021-22, following a request by Mr Lambie to review the former School Rules.

At a little over 250 words, ours is far shorter than many codes of conduct and less than a quarter the length of the former School Rules.

The Code of Conduct can be viewed here.

 

 If you have any questions or comments on this article, do let us know. Simply follow this link.